Posted by:
Ishah Wright for Senate & Ishah L. Wright for Congress on
February 4, 2008 at
3:02PM EST
Ishah won the case in the 5DCA Appeal Court in Florida again with a "noted" order that "noted" in order Ishah's "Response Clarification" of which part of the Response was this email from Jason R showing he lied about Ishah in lower court and why he never contested and never responded in the US Supreme Court and the 5DCA Court ever. The email was given to Ishah after she served JRW legal papers and emails letting him know that she had disclosed and was preparing to disclose more of JRW's lies about Ishah to authorities and JRW's and his family members on his side's true background history that JRW and JRW's family members on JRW's side didn't deny that JRW and JRW's family on JRW's side committed crimes against children including illegal drugs around children and much worse. Ishah sent legal notice that Ishah would send this email as meaning this. Jason R did not reply in writing in any of the courts after this, including Orange County, Seminole County FL and the 5DCA, US Supreme Court, Sec of the Commonwealth of Virginia's Office (where Ishah appeared with Geri and received authentications, legalizations, certified by the Sec. of VA's Office) and more. Yet the Appeal 5DCA Docket does not show this JRW's Confession Email on the record or online docket to prove that Jason R. lied about Ishah in the Orange County FL court, and this redemption of Ishah Laurah Wright's legal character profile background history was never given to the lower court to clear Ishah's name and the "noted" order was not fully written to be seen in the field on the record given to Orange County, thus Orange County did not know what Ishah won and that JRW lied, and when Ishah returned to the Orange Co Court to get them to assist in the return of her son, they waited too long to respond and then said to refile, so Ishah returned to the Appeal Court to assist in the informing and enforcing of what Ishah won, and the Appeal Court Clerk refused to update this on the record and online docket as saying it was a miscellaneous motion that had no just cause.